Like many I've had "The Footsoldiers" sitting on the shelf for quite a while. I've delved into the pages where my father gets named but not a lot more. I'm really looking forward to finding a context for the bits that I do know through this study of the book.
It is exactly the same for myself. When I first started to research my grandfather's service, I simply flicked to the pages he was mentioned on and not really much more. There is no denying that 'The Footsoldiers' is a very in-depth book, but as a group we can tackle it together.
I do have a question though - the comments by Cotton say that the early War Diaries are woefully inadequate - what is missing from them? What should be there?
I am sure that Felicity Hickman will be able to answer this better than anyone with the research Felicity has been conducting with her father's letters. The early diaries just lacked detailed information. They give a very broad overview, but lack the finer details such as service numbers, names, just specifics really. The detail that is contained within 'The Footsoldiers' actually came from the soldiers replying to Bill Crooks' request for information. It was only then that he had the detail required to write the book in the detail we have today. This is also largely why it is considered one of the best written battalion histories of WWII.
Regards, Matt